<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tomato Firmware Option for WRT54GL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mandladventures.com/2008/01/19/tomato-firmware-option-for-wrt54gl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mandladventures.com/2008/01/19/tomato-firmware-option-for-wrt54gl/</link>
	<description>Leading you on the technical adventure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:10:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tomato Firmware Upgrade and Demo Video &#8211; M and L Adventures</title>
		<link>http://www.mandladventures.com/2008/01/19/tomato-firmware-option-for-wrt54gl/comment-page-1/#comment-25994</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomato Firmware Upgrade and Demo Video &#8211; M and L Adventures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mandladventures.com/2008/01/19/tomato-firmware-option-for-wrt54gl/#comment-25994</guid>
		<description>[...] detailed firmware flashing instructions. However, I&#8217;ve been debating on switching to the Tomato firmware for close to year [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] detailed firmware flashing instructions. However, I&#8217;ve been debating on switching to the Tomato firmware for close to year [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.mandladventures.com/2008/01/19/tomato-firmware-option-for-wrt54gl/comment-page-1/#comment-25987</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 02:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mandladventures.com/2008/01/19/tomato-firmware-option-for-wrt54gl/#comment-25987</guid>
		<description>It should be fine for Tomato. Very surprised it didn&#039;t work correctly with DD-WRT. Typically, the issue is with Vista&#039;s wireless networking configuration rather than the router. If you hide your SSID (i.e., don&#039;t broadcast your wireless network name), you have to enable a setting in Vista in order to connect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be fine for Tomato. Very surprised it didn&#8217;t work correctly with DD-WRT. Typically, the issue is with Vista&#8217;s wireless networking configuration rather than the router. If you hide your SSID (i.e., don&#8217;t broadcast your wireless network name), you have to enable a setting in Vista in order to connect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jun</title>
		<link>http://www.mandladventures.com/2008/01/19/tomato-firmware-option-for-wrt54gl/comment-page-1/#comment-25984</link>
		<dc:creator>jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mandladventures.com/2008/01/19/tomato-firmware-option-for-wrt54gl/#comment-25984</guid>
		<description>Matt: When I tried DD-WRT, there is an option to enable or diable IPV6 from Administration. If IPV6 is not Enabled, I could see wireless signal but no Internet connection when a laptop installed Vista was used to test(a laptop of a firend). With the currently 1.25 tomato, it is ok for Vista ? (My friend has gone to a vacations for severals months). No way to test it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt: When I tried DD-WRT, there is an option to enable or diable IPV6 from Administration. If IPV6 is not Enabled, I could see wireless signal but no Internet connection when a laptop installed Vista was used to test(a laptop of a firend). With the currently 1.25 tomato, it is ok for Vista ? (My friend has gone to a vacations for severals months). No way to test it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.mandladventures.com/2008/01/19/tomato-firmware-option-for-wrt54gl/comment-page-1/#comment-25983</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mandladventures.com/2008/01/19/tomato-firmware-option-for-wrt54gl/#comment-25983</guid>
		<description>Jun: Tomato is nice as is DD-WRT. Not to burst your bubble but IPv6 support is not important. Pretty much every new OS supports it as does every new router. However, IPv6 is not actually used by the public Internet. For more info read the PCWorld article titled &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/150013/study_shows_glacial_pace_of_ipv6_adoption.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Study Shows Glacial Pace of IPv6 Adoption&lt;/a&gt; and check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.grc.com/sn/sn-199.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Security Now Episode 199 (&quot;The Geek Atlas,&quot; IPv6 &amp; Non-VPN)&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jun: Tomato is nice as is DD-WRT. Not to burst your bubble but IPv6 support is not important. Pretty much every new OS supports it as does every new router. However, IPv6 is not actually used by the public Internet. For more info read the PCWorld article titled <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/150013/study_shows_glacial_pace_of_ipv6_adoption.html" rel="nofollow">Study Shows Glacial Pace of IPv6 Adoption</a> and check out <a href="http://www.grc.com/sn/sn-199.pdf" rel="nofollow">Security Now Episode 199 (&#8220;The Geek Atlas,&#8221; IPv6 &#038; Non-VPN)</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jun</title>
		<link>http://www.mandladventures.com/2008/01/19/tomato-firmware-option-for-wrt54gl/comment-page-1/#comment-25982</link>
		<dc:creator>jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mandladventures.com/2008/01/19/tomato-firmware-option-for-wrt54gl/#comment-25982</guid>
		<description>Matt: I upgrated to DD-WRT for a trial. It looks like Tomota is slightly more fast and stableas you mentionned. DD-WRT really has a lot of features. After researching a lot in web, I did not know the answer for the MOST IMPORTANT issue for me: Tomato supports IPV6 ? Vista is using IPV6 and Window7 also. I am planning to upgrade my OS to Window 7(Windows 7 also runs IPV6).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt: I upgrated to DD-WRT for a trial. It looks like Tomota is slightly more fast and stableas you mentionned. DD-WRT really has a lot of features. After researching a lot in web, I did not know the answer for the MOST IMPORTANT issue for me: Tomato supports IPV6 ? Vista is using IPV6 and Window7 also. I am planning to upgrade my OS to Window 7(Windows 7 also runs IPV6).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.mandladventures.com/2008/01/19/tomato-firmware-option-for-wrt54gl/comment-page-1/#comment-25976</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mandladventures.com/2008/01/19/tomato-firmware-option-for-wrt54gl/#comment-25976</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to write a comparison of dd-wrt to Tomato. Quickly, both seem stable. Tomato might be ever so slightly more stable but that is in comparison to an older version of dd-wrt. dd-wrt seems to have more features but lacks the pretty graphs. The main reason I switched to Tomato was for bandwidth tracking but the new dd-wrt has that feature now. Also, dd-wrt seems to be under more active development. If I were you, I&#039;d stick with dd-wrt but don&#039;t get me wrong, Tomato is an excellent option as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to write a comparison of dd-wrt to Tomato. Quickly, both seem stable. Tomato might be ever so slightly more stable but that is in comparison to an older version of dd-wrt. dd-wrt seems to have more features but lacks the pretty graphs. The main reason I switched to Tomato was for bandwidth tracking but the new dd-wrt has that feature now. Also, dd-wrt seems to be under more active development. If I were you, I&#8217;d stick with dd-wrt but don&#8217;t get me wrong, Tomato is an excellent option as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: junn</title>
		<link>http://www.mandladventures.com/2008/01/19/tomato-firmware-option-for-wrt54gl/comment-page-1/#comment-25975</link>
		<dc:creator>junn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 04:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mandladventures.com/2008/01/19/tomato-firmware-option-for-wrt54gl/#comment-25975</guid>
		<description>I just upgrade my brand new wrt54gl to dd-wrt. Do have compare dd-wrt with tomato ? Which is fast and stable ? I could not find any complete comparison bwteen these two firmwares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just upgrade my brand new wrt54gl to dd-wrt. Do have compare dd-wrt with tomato ? Which is fast and stable ? I could not find any complete comparison bwteen these two firmwares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.mandladventures.com/2008/01/19/tomato-firmware-option-for-wrt54gl/comment-page-1/#comment-25971</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mandladventures.com/2008/01/19/tomato-firmware-option-for-wrt54gl/#comment-25971</guid>
		<description>brianko, great feedback. It&#039;s always good to hear another person who is as equally impressed with dd-wrt as I am. No wonder the WRT54GL router has been won the customer choice award 26 times on Newegg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brianko, great feedback. It&#8217;s always good to hear another person who is as equally impressed with dd-wrt as I am. No wonder the WRT54GL router has been won the customer choice award 26 times on Newegg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brianko</title>
		<link>http://www.mandladventures.com/2008/01/19/tomato-firmware-option-for-wrt54gl/comment-page-1/#comment-25970</link>
		<dc:creator>brianko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 03:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mandladventures.com/2008/01/19/tomato-firmware-option-for-wrt54gl/#comment-25970</guid>
		<description>FWIW, after having a year of 1500/300 speeds with Time-Warner (supposedly after the RR-Turbo free upgrade), I called T-W and they sent out a tech to do some line checks.  He replaced a bad cable drop outside the house, and for a few minutes, we saw 8000/700 speeds.  After he left, it dropped back down to the old speeds.

Make a long story short:  The Netgear firewall turned out to be the choke point.  After resetting it, throughput quickly drops.  I bought a WRT54GL router, installed Tomato, and now have 9000/750 peak speeds.  Not too bad for  a $60 router and open source software!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, after having a year of 1500/300 speeds with Time-Warner (supposedly after the RR-Turbo free upgrade), I called T-W and they sent out a tech to do some line checks.  He replaced a bad cable drop outside the house, and for a few minutes, we saw 8000/700 speeds.  After he left, it dropped back down to the old speeds.</p>
<p>Make a long story short:  The Netgear firewall turned out to be the choke point.  After resetting it, throughput quickly drops.  I bought a WRT54GL router, installed Tomato, and now have 9000/750 peak speeds.  Not too bad for  a $60 router and open source software!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linksys WRT54GL Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) Vulnerability at M and L Adventures</title>
		<link>http://www.mandladventures.com/2008/01/19/tomato-firmware-option-for-wrt54gl/comment-page-1/#comment-24962</link>
		<dc:creator>Linksys WRT54GL Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) Vulnerability at M and L Adventures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mandladventures.com/2008/01/19/tomato-firmware-option-for-wrt54gl/#comment-24962</guid>
		<description>[...] and gain additional features by upgrading to an open source firmware such as DD-WRT or Tomato. I happen to own a Linksys WRT54GL version 1.1 and have flashed it with the DD-WRT firmware. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and gain additional features by upgrading to an open source firmware such as DD-WRT or Tomato. I happen to own a Linksys WRT54GL version 1.1 and have flashed it with the DD-WRT firmware. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
